25 May 2007
Coming to the end of 6 years at [the college], 5 years in SD.
- What have I done since the doc
- mbo and the website
- a few students
- the Alberta trip
- camping with Luke
- recovered physically I think
- Work & days: GW, AG, SH, Frank after
- kept faith with T
- transient garden beauty
Lived shut away mostly
- Do you want to add anything creation, Ellie, subtle,
honesty
- Is that what you mean
- For instance the dullness of the journal no
- Will you say more undefeated, processing, courageous,
fight
- I did that? yes
- Will you say in relation to what not withdrawing
- I mostly didn't deke out YES
- In my old ways YES
-
'ocean as sacred wilderness' (surfing doc)
26
There was a hit in w&d this morning - Singapore - someone who searched
'Babby Tiong' and checked through to the index page of AG16. So I read
that page, which was the Christmas I was writing analog/digital.
I loved the writing. I was feeling how, since what I'm transcribing in DR,
I'd gotten to writing exactly what I'll later want to read.
Am transcribing the weeks moving around as a camp attendant. I remember
around what I wrote, but what I remember isn't written.
What I got to toward the end of AG and in through GW to the first vol
of [this section] was right being and writing, both. [The college]
is costing me a lot. Quitting and being an artist on a grant isn't the solution.
The deadlines and standards [at SFU] made a difference.
Writing beside - would that work - after this stretch of DR is transcribed,
1975-1980, whenever I went back to Vancouver - the blindsided stretch 1976-1980
- what wd it be about - lesbians - the stoned credulity era - at the same
time the experimental film science reading - at the same time high-hormone
early 30s erotic heat - at the same time the land-feeling that was unknown
to my companions - where did the myth feeling come from, goddess stuff in
feminism - struggle to find or make a platform in art, lost because I was
refusing a lot -
In that late AG journal there's so much certainty - even in great pain
I wasn't unsure. It's a settled self. That self is the accomplishment, it's
much more outward. It watches itself, I had learned to do that, but what
it notices in that is worth noticing, which in DR often it wasn't.
It's so much a work of time. If I had died too soon there'd have been
mostly just a mess.
I'm at Starbucks at an outside table, writing on my knee, right leg up
on the chair. I've whipped through the LA Times and the Union.
A soy chai latte. There's a breeze. Blooming jacarandas throwing shadow
onto the sidewalk - the morning grey has burned off. I'm wearing my green
cord jeans with the shortsleeved black linen shirt. A black collar always
suits me. I'm tanned. Have a pink thriving look these days though I'm thick
at the waist. Writing in sunglasses because of the glare. Love the bite
of sun on my arm.
A man reading at the next table. He's holding a small hardback almost
at arm's length, breathing slowly as if asleep. A large man in his forties,
blue jean shorts and pale blue teeshirt. All the men on this sidewalk, as
it happens, are wearing pants cut off at the knee. It's Memorial Day weekend.
Tom's working though it's Saturday.
I have horrible Darlene's packet to get out of the way, get it over with,
to have time next week to start at Dawne. Nora's selling it. We'd never
been there together, went yesterday. Nina and Todd's junk gone. There's
the hillside full and tall, ceanothus, the matilijas coming into bloom 6'
up. Nor stood at the kitchen window looking out at the view, feeling her
years in that house, the man, his wrecked death, how far she has taken her
rescue, the moment of giving it up after perfecting it first.
27
Jam's copy of Selected Cantos that I somehow still have and didn't
get rid of when I dumped Rilke and Roethke - her notes in pencil, a few,
written very small - when I see her handwriting I remember, slightly remember,
loving her. I like it - tiny tight roundness. It's confident and incisive,
has scholarly precision. In what way is it more elegant than mine - it has
more dash but that's not all of it. There's conscious style in the way she'll
sometimes use * for e. Wife, eyes. She has two kinds of s and two kinds
of e. I'm more a plodder. In Dames rocket the two kinds of teacher,
no, more than two: Kiyooka's girls for dope mind, Jam for focus, Nellie
for swash, Daphne for writing close to the instant, did I learn from Josie?
I loved Josie.
The way Jam's handwriting says her nervous system is better than mine
- and yet she was crazier and meaner, crankier. Alright, yes, I'll let myself
recover the way I loved in that time - can I? - abjectly.
- 1975-1985 Vancouver, Alberta, Saturna. 820 A E Pender
- Paul, Maggie, Nellie, T and C, Jam, Robert MacLean
- Le Guin,
- film, writing, photographs, tapes
- science reading, science fiction
- began Joyce, tarot
It begins with arriving in Vancouver, ends with Michael and the downtown
East End. Want to say ends with what will we know but it went on
for a while after that. No, ends pregnant and trapped with Jam who is crazier
and crankier than she was. But still we see light together sublimely. But
she hates me, she despises me for catching her in her weakness.
Jam is the one to write - could I? Light metaphysics. I chose well though
hard. I picked a phenomenon. The work was done when I'd spent that month
with her box of books. And then misery dragged on for another five years.
- Leaving the lake house in the fall of 1980.
- That's a marker.
- Reading wwwk in Trudy's place is another.
- An apron, an inkwell in the foundered house.
29
Saturday and Sunday night at Tom's. Packet 5s this morning, Dawne this
aft, coming home in the Acura with Aretha cranked, happy. Can't write it
tonight.
30
I had stuck the datura under the honeysuckle because it was yellowy,
and didn't notice it was going to bloom. Saturday I was watering the pots
and there it was with a pink flower and three more in large bud. Took it
inside and Sunday evening - only in the evening - it diffused an exquisite
scent from the mantle. I was standing under it with my nose up the trumpet
and Tom was laughing from his corner.
We drove to La Jolla with beautiful Nora who took the long route to entertain
us, 52 that treed valley, and then up over Mt Soledad to see Pacific Beach
far below, further than seems possible given that Mt Soledad isn't very
high.
Beautiful Nora in baseball cap, big eyes and redhead's flush and pretty
roundnesses below. It's always an occasion when I'm with her.
We loaded two shovels and a pick and a rake and then Tom and I went for
steaks to Denny's in PB. Memorial Day weekend at the beach. Three drunken
louts in muscle shirts, burned red, white skin under the arms, calling to
girls walking past to the washroom.
Home in the green executive car. Tom was conscious of being seen in it.
We stopped at Blockbusters and picked two each. School of rock
and what was the other one of Tom's, Babel, that night.
We are so comfortable together these days. I'm saying that knowing it
won't always be so, although it now feels as if it will. There's Tom not
eating fat and losing his pooch, handsome-headed with a good haircut. Saturday
night he was going on about writing a Vanishing San Diego piece with
me, it was two in the morning.
Sunday I went home to deal with my mail and came back with supper. Greek
salad and hamburgers, raspberry sherbet. Then my two movies, a doc about
New York fifth graders in a ballroom dance competition, Mad hot ballroom,
and then Dune, which was over-the-top bad.
We are watching movies together very companionably, cuddling and commenting.
The best of the weekend was Sunday morning when we got in the car, Tom
driving, and cruised slowly up El Cajon and back on University. The ethnic
neighborhoods, storefront churches and chiropractors, a warm quiet morning
with a cool breeze, streets empty. We got into the gazing trance I like,
silent together just looking. Gardens, houses, early summer, jacarandas
and palms. Dire straits, Knofler's sharp fine precise soulful touch spinning
out his perfect line.
Yesterday Statcounter showed someone in New York getting into Work
& days through the In America 4 index page. Checked through to that page
and read it. It was ravishing. I'm not writing like that now but there it
is, I did accomplish it. It's relaxed and intent. In any circumstance it's
very readable.
Yesterday midafternoon after I'd been reading packets that had come in
I drove to Dawne and was in the quiet garden shaping the olive trees, thinning
them and pruning up to show their white legs, clearing the steps down, ripping
out grass at the bottom of the hill. Loved being there, loved having the
garden back, with the junky renters gone. Doves on the wire. The bird that
sounds like a gurgle of water.
-
My bp felt high after I was writing to Darlene this morning and I checked
it. 190/105, highest I've seen it. Scared me. It's felt low, silky relaxed,
so what is it today. Darlene and then being scared of it. No wonder I hate
her. But what is it about her, just her disorderedness? Exercise yesterday?
- Am I going to die of a stroke no
- Seriously be injured by no
- Will I have to take 3 drugs and a statin no
- Can I do it w/o meds
- Hard exercise every day no
- Every other day
- Treadmill 15 min
- Lose 15 pounds
-
At four o'clock after finishing two letters, drove to Tom's to get him.
Went to the beach at South Mission. It was quiet after the holiday, ocean
green and silver, rolling choppy silver, pelicans turning suddenly straight
down, folding at the last moment, a thrilling collapse.
'In India people believe that beauty is humans'
relation to the divine.' Mira Nakasima on PBS craft show.
The motion of the water was unseeable, unstoppable, but two kinds of
glitter though fast can be held somewhat. The moment when the near edge
of the wave is rapidly pulling back and the last slick of water on sand
glitters between the grains. It's very fleet, a field of minute flashes,
the whole field running away leaving smoothness behind. The other is the
whole surface to the horizon on the line directly to the sun. I can't remember
it to describe it, except to say it's shattered silver in commotion, constant
and jittery. Look better next time.
In the car Tom said "Hold out your hand. Turn it. Now the other
one, closer so I can see it. You're shaky today." "Yes I'm quivery,
how did you know." "I felt it." I was scared when he was
driving.
31
Used the car to go to Amvets, bought swim trunks for Tom that I left
on his bed with summer pj pants and a moss green waffle t. Phoned him when
I got home. He loves the shorts. Gurkha-surfer he said. I'm chuffed.
Is it driving that is making me happy these days. Fleet sleek pretty
car. Dark green. Best shape for a car.
Moss green linen short-sleeved shirt for me. Socks, drinking glasses.
1st June
- The period we now live in, the twenty-first
century, is perhaps the only time in human history when common people have
held so little knowledge of the sky. 32
-
- Craig Childs 2006 House of rain: tracking
a vanished civilization across the American southwest Little, Brown
and Co
-
- - A minicourse called The sky
-
- cycles - sun rise and set
- moon rise and set
- zenith and nadir
- sky words from Persian
- optics
- transparency currents marking the invisible
- straight lines in nature
-
- Tenuous body: the sky
-
- a particular place
- an interdisciplinary
- visualizing
- the frame of the sky
- spatial mapping
- environmental studies, consciousness studies, TLA - embodiment studies
as ground of all
- the language of
- psychology of sky
- guided reverie
- Bachelard, Minnaert, cloud book, vis tapes
-
- What does it feel like
-
- What color is the sky?
-
- Yeats on moon cycle
- 'blueskying'
- openness
- imagining blue
- gravity and the lines out
- invisible communication
- wind
- daily sky photo
- daily sky writing
- is there sky literature
- sound
- water, earth, rock
- sky as matter - tenuous to dense
- Buddhists
- the motion of the Milky Way
-
- The people had tied themselves to points on
the horizon and points in the sky 35
-
- confirming the peerless order of the world
40
-
- turquoise, bear paws, mountain lion claws
-
- supernova in AD 1054 as bright as the full
moon for almost a month, visible in the middle of the day. At night it
bathed the earth in a ghostly ruby-colored light. It was positioned off
Orion's shoulder Over the next six years this light slowly faded
-
- the Neolithic: China 12,000 BC, Greece 6500 BC,
Mississippi 2500 BC, Chaco 11,000 AD
-
- a formative stage nearly every civilization
has gone through, a tipping point where wild plant gathering mixed with
domestic agriculture and domestic animals
-
- Early metallurgy usually started with copper
networks of farming villages As part of Neolithic development, enormous
stone and wood architecture often showed up, as if people were experimenting
with their new-found ability to pool labor 44
-
- Polaris 'dependable and due north'
- the great North Road
-
- architecture professor who had studied how
various cultures align themselves on the land
-
- had intentionally nested themselves into a
landscape
-
- digging into one of these humps discovered
a bowl delicately carved ... out of its lip inset, where a lid was seated
... a handful of turquoise inside
-
- deepest rooms storing ceramic ollas filled with
water
-
- 18.6 year lunar standstill cycle - at the full
of winter solstice, where the moon rises at sunset the waxing half will
rise at the following spring equinox and the new at sunrise at summer solstice,
the waning half at noon at autumn equinox. 2004
-
- sipapu -
hole in the floor of a kiva said to be entrance to another world
- sitalpu -
Hopi flower world - luminously colored spirit realm existing alongside
this one - ancestors in clouds, flowers and stars
-
- the Hopi are descendents - mesas in northeast
Arizona -
-
- I have been trying to understand the qualities
of distances by actually moving across them
-
- Also Zuni etc, NW New Mexico, katsina religion
- Taos
- Navajo - SW 16th c from SE Alaska and BC
-
- Puebloans
is the neutral term
-
- a form of organization carried across a landscape
-
- It tasted like good, earthen water.
-
- A chemical signature of local soils passes
through nutrients in food and is imprinted into certain molars, forming
an indelible birth certificate. 329
-
- Less than 5' tall
-
- pools from which people are said to have emerged
-
- House of rain is where the dead go.
- a watery paradise inside a mountain
- fabled underground lake
-
- spinning fires to life on a fire board
-
- Places where water emerges from stone, dark
holes into the underworld, are profoundly sacred.
-
- northwestern Chihuahua corn 4000 years old
- Central America 5000 years ago
- corn, beans and squash seeds, AD 400 cotton
2
Kri irritating me today. Her arguments say men aren't inherently violent,
boys aren't inherently combative, it's only when they are crowded, it's
only when they are abused, neglected, it's only when resources are tight,
there COULD be a peaceful world, a safe world.
What do I hate about that.
For instance the three of us at home fighting very naturally, fighting
and getting along, and again. The naturalness, though the adults yell. My
pleasure in being able to fight with Tom. Irritation with people I have
to back off from.
She has a good question: what would have to change to prevent the kind
of warring that destroys intelligence and fine life.
Free energy and action.
- She's very combative
- Am I right to say men are that
- Am I right to say it costs them
- War on one side and babies on the other
- Does she have any access to the instinctual no
- She's very heady
- Wanting to let loose and protect
- Joy of letting loose
- What was wrong with Mennonite men
- Callous disregard
- Lives that come up against death
- The humans need war
- Should she try speaking for the other side
- There is an other side, value of war
- Value of death
- She leans too much on 'conditioning'
- It's not deus ex machina, it's body too
- Her writing is at its best describing aikido
- Complexity
- I am at war
- Subtly all the time
- And so is she
- Anyone who is interesting is
- 50% of people have IQs less than 100
- Evolutionary quality from combat
4
[Ida Rolf notes]
collagen myofascial connective tissue
can be changed by adding energy
fascial connective tissue is the organ of structure
relation of the body to the gravitational field
rolfers are integrating something
Korzybski
structure overstressed and shortened, skewed
so the joints can't set up verticality
As soon as you get balance you get strength.
Flow of fluid giving interchange from bloodstream
Anything that contributes to really good physiology is properly part of a moral code.
63
a time in the course of - when you see that
your [client] is able to align but doesn't want to
misunderstanding the way we build a body
"top of my head up and back of my waist back"
every 15 minutes, just say it
Structure gives you a criterion by which to
evaluate people.
Look at the person in terms of his shoulders,
the way his neck sits, and the way his cranium sits on his neck. 190
Fascia on the outside will be so tight ... it
will tend to protect the area that's in trouble ... If you are doing the
right thing and there isn't some deep pathology, the fascia will let go.
A rolfer wants to get it so that individual
elements inside that bandage are able to slide and organize and adjust with
movement.
-
Chicken for supper last night, tamari and mustard coated, under the grill
6 minutes per side - better chicken than I've made, ever. Another texture,
less dead, wet.
Sore muscles these days. I'm feeling a flesh fold at the back of my waist
on the right, feels bad.
5
Craig Childs on the Anasazi. It's a book, like his others about walking
in the Four Corners lands. He's talking to archeologists learning what they
know and learning to see what they see in a landscape, and working to build
a sense of the human history of his own childhood place. He's doing it by
working on a book. The book lays out what he's learned by telling the physical
story of his visits to places - how he held his hands, how he climbed a
slope, how he lay with his stepfather in shade at noon. He is sometimes
with his baby and wife, and he mentions them or his other companions briefly.
Weather, terrain, time of day. The story of traveling. What am I looking
to say. Something about what his work is. The secret knowledge of water
was about perception - he put himself into extreme need so that he would
perceive more and then be able to write about doing so. House of rain
is not as solitary, he is meshed into the concerns of archeologists. He
is synthesizing archeology, but also integrating it with geography and his
own physical experience of terrain.
He is a figure in his book: athletic, heroic, intent. "Naturalist,
adventurer, desert ecologist" says the back flap. But carefully modest,
conscious. He's another kind of writer who both does and writes, and he's
not the locked-into-maleness kind of man who would have written about the
southwest a generation ago. He's more intact but not less hardy. The old
kind of man would have had to drink to feel. This book is less ecstatic,
is what it is. What I'm seeing is small tight handwriting - it's not a whole-body
book.
Something forms by means of it - did form, at moments. I'm not remembering
it now. It was earlier in the book, when he was standing in ruins imagining
them inhabited. Something about archeology, people giving their lifetimes
to imagining an anthropology, creating an understory of time, an underworld
of time. Anthropology and the sipapu. What had to happen to make
this moment what it is.
- There is that, but it's not what I was tracking and what my body said
yes to. (Do we have any visualization of that, something like the sipapu?)
- It's imagining destruction, imagining death. It's a true vision of
evanescence. We have of the past what it has made of us. And of the future
what we are making in it.
Not 'have' but are. But that's not what I meant to say either.
- When I'm camping alone in wild places and see people or a face as I'm
falling asleep, what is that? Always only one image a night, always clear
and particular.
It's Tuesday morning, grey. It'll be hot by evening, I had the window
open last night, but it's cold now. I still have Kri's letter to finish,
and then 8 evaluations to hustle through this week. This aft have to speak
to a man called Alfred about rototilling at Dawne.
Paul is up north traveling with Dave Leonard.
There were weeks with a lot of hits on all my sites, and this month,
so far, almost nothing.
Sunday aft Tom and I watched an early Democratic debate.
Michael Duke yesterday sane and looking well. He comes back from the
brink.
6
The geographic difference of the US - that it has vast regions so different
from others, and that Americans have felt these regions as legendary. As
if the southwest is the legendary core.
-
Margo's eval up to the end of the Emily semester.
Good: maybe: Margo is back.
She was dredging up Emily because she's coming back still clouded administratively
and they're watching her - she's in a bind - she believed in what I was
doing - she wants souls to win through -
But her perceived duty is to rein me in -
So she has to be seen to rein me in - so she's saying next semester I
must consult about how I work with students, which enrages me. I'd rather
go flat than do that.
- If I'm going to go flat I should find work I can be whole-hearted
in
- My relation with Margo is spoiled unfixably
Question is, how can I work at [the college] without M's confidence in
me.
M is harrowed, that's why she's starting there.
- She feels she did something wrong. Did she? no
She's pinning it on packet format and study plan!
- Something generous and courageous and true-spirited has gone wrong.
- Inspiring work - it is inspiring work.
- Stop being generous, courageous and true-hearted?
- Crisis.
- I'm not willing to be micromanaged and shouldn't be.
- I'm willing to promise I won't do any personal work with people - am
I? I'll do that for her. But my heart is angry saying so.
- No - I won't do that. I looked at my letters for this semester and
no they are as they should be.
-
- She isn't strong enough to see me through this
- So I have to be stronger than she is
I did good work with Kri and Polly and Justin, and they were the most
personal.
- So should I just train to be a therapist? no
- She wants to make rules for everybody but I'm the only
one they are aimed at because I'm the only one who can do this stuff
- Kri got how to integrate verbal and nonverbal in the
academic
Justin got through the conference and his love terror, he saw an abandonment
kin.
- Polly got brave and then backed up and then got work
- These people feel seen in their wholeness
- The segregation of therapy is nonsense
- Jimmy got a look at his voice splits
Becci got through.
I can see roots and I've done the work.
- Do you think I'm too personal no
- Do you have anything you want to say about this
no
- I'm being asked to conform to a pathology
I thought she was supporting me because she was courageous and principled,
but it was more that she is overawed.
- Is there an implication coming through early love
to responsibility with the uncon
- Her uncon
7
- I woke at 4 stressed about Margo.
- What to do about the stress. Heart pressure.
- There were wonderful years feeling I had her confidence, creative,
expansive, learning.
- She supported risk, she liked my largeness.
- August 2001 - August 2005 four years
- 2 years since then have been less
- I flunked a test with Mil and Susan
-
- Should I quit no
-
- I was out of my depth with Mil because I didn't understand paranoia,
I didn't know she would turn.
- Loss of confidence and candor.
- It's what happens to early love - just here - the decision to shut
down and withhold.
- It's a familiar crisis.
- I feel myself going bitter, I say I'll hide my light.
-
- Her suggestions are wrong
Art and art therapy - she was studying that.
What do I want.
To be large-spirited, confident, generous, creative, energized, brilliant,
transparent in work.
- Is that still possible?
As opposed to polite, dull, withholding, secretive, mediocre.
- It plays out everybody's drama
- Am I still going to be able to love Margo no
- Am I still going to be able to love students
"Lighter and freer"
- Because she has failed with admin
- So I have to show her how to do it
- Fear winning over love
- I won't have that
- An outcome where love is not defeated by fear, that's
what I'm about
- It so easily is
- Does Margo exaggerate the fall-out
- Because of her own oedipal drama
- Is that what you mean
Justin on the phone last night. Polly didn't call when she said she would.
He was distraught. I said he's very distressed by suspense and he can work
on that insecure attachment, and this one is very insecure. He said he's
not feeling anything. I said doesn't he feel something in his chest. All
the time, he says. I say that's feeling. He says he means crying, sobbing.
I say there's a lot of energy in the stage he's at, and he can choose to
use it on working with himself, so that if he loses Polly he will still
have the work he's done, which will help him for next time. I hear him catch
that. In the middle of the conversation he says he wants to ask something
and I needn't answer: are the person I did the work with and I still together.
I say yes, twelve years.
He's so courtly and honorable. He was in the state where it's hard to
speak. Word by word. "Thank you for being with me in this - I wanted
to say, in this with me." When he wanted to go he said "I feel
a lot of affection for you at this moment."
What I have been saying to Margo, thinking to say to Margo, is that I
don't think of what I do with students as therapy, I think of it as fellow-feeling.
I see them in distress and say to them, In my experience this is how it
works. A therapist doesn't tell on herself, I always do.
Should I write out another document giving examples of withholding what
I know.
I can think of this as educating Margo.
The point is that I know what's up. She often doesn't. My situation is
different because I do know.
I feel my heart going tight thinking of the question of her supervising
me.
I need her to tell me what part of this is her initiative and what, if
anything, is required of her.
She wants to insist on the phone - because there's no record - and because
she can hear honesty and put me on the spot? If so she's not candid, because
she says she needs to talk things out. She could talk them out with someone
else.
I need to keep this going until I get other money.
- Would I make a project of it - write something.
- The personal in education.
- What the pressures are.
- What the customary blankness is for.
- What M's fear is
9
Statcounter is run by an Irishman called Aodhán, I mean run from
Ireland, as I found out this morning when I got a note asking me to vote
for him as European Entrepreneur under 25.
Working with Al Davalos at Dawne yesterday, two hours with dirt and hillside,
the lower rectangle clean for the first time, smooth and bare, framed with
a good green, looking up at the finished hillside, a landing.
There was a wet spot at the base of the hill, very wet. I wondered whether
he'd rototilled into a pipe and so put the spade down into a spot that I
thought might be the origin. There was water rushing into the hole through
what looked like a round pipe on its side. No pipe though, just a firm hole.
I excavated back. It took a turn. It was a gopher hole. I had my arm up
it feeling its firm round sides out into solid earth. It was draining the
hillside from someplace higher up, a riser now swamped by brush.
My jeep guy, Bob, at Robert's Automotive yesterday. I was talking to
him about buying a Cherokee, marveling the way I always do, at how wonderful
a man he is. I go away in a little dazzle of liking. He's good looking,
he's a jeep specialist, he's relaxed, he's generous with his time, I never
feel he's hurrying away. He has a porous, kind, taking-in quality like the
best doctors. It's intelligence. He's settled into life. He's pleased with
it. When he was leaving he said "I'm sorry about your jeep" and
I felt he had put a gentle finger on my chest; that was what I needed from
him and he'd given it.
11
Jia Zhang-ke 2000 Platform, Fenyang Shanxi.
Patient long takes.
This weekend with Tom.
I woke during the night and found my hand above me had curled around
his forearm. Later I woke again and found his hand under my pillow.
We watched Platform Saturday night and again yesterday. We hadn't
figured out that we could turn on the subtitles. Long takes of a sand-colored
town among stony mountains the same color, or people in bare rooms seeming
to be camping in ruins. Every frame beautiful - my kind of framing. A specific
palette, blue and sand often with a speck of red. Inside, the off-green
I know from Chinatown rooms. Framing quite formal, not afraid to be gorgeous.
Few very intentional camera movements. The actors very natural in their
postures. Fiddling with their hair, slouching.
Afterward we discovered the subtitle button and watched an interview
with the director. Luke's age, a nice face. Someone from deep country showing
what he saw when he was a child, showing it to understand it.
The other thing that happened was that I downloaded my letter to Margo,
that had her letter appended, and Tom sat intent on both with his glasses
on for twenty minutes, and then gave his considered summation, compact and
lucid of his best.
All weekend I was listening to myself laugh, I imagined someone upstairs
hearing us laughing together again and again.
[M,
Your letter is exquisitely careful to be just and generous and hopeful.
Nonetheless it was distressing, stressing. More about that below.
This is a beautiful statement of dilemma:
How can we as a college or a program proceed holistically if we cannot
be inclusive of emotional material (or, for that matter, deeply spiritual/transpersonal
states, unconscious/dream material) if we are personally uncomfortable with
them or even dismissive of them (either by relegating them to journal entries
which we will not comment upon, or denying their relevance to the work of
the semester, or saying they should be taken away to someone else to deal
with-the professional therapist)? What really do we mean by the "being"
criteria if we are not inclusive of emotional or unconscious or transpersonal
states?
But the reality is that both you and I are now being scrutinized and
we are having to bend over backwards to avoid an appearance of overstepping
or sanctioning overstepping. It's no longer about my best judgment or yours,
or about best definitions we can come up with, it is about the amorphous
judgments of others.
What has happened is a large loss and I'm sad about it, as I'm sure you
are.
I certainly don't want to get you into any more trouble, and I certainly
will do what I can not to.
- I wrote those last three paragraphs and then I thought for a couple
of days and realized that I need to know whether you are feeling explicit
pressure from admin to closely supervise me, or whether it's your own idea.
I know you are coming back feeling somewhat under a cloud, but are you having
to give someone assurances that you are adequately curbing me? Is someone
going to be asking to see evidence? I need to know this because I need to
know for sure whether it now is about my best judgment and yours, or whether
it IS about satisfying people who have much less idea of how anything works.
About packets - I don't remember why I didn't formally ask for your okay
to do her semester as email rather than packets but I think it was because
in the first half of the semester the decision came after the fact. She
began her semester with email the moment she got home and then the work
was so thick and fast that by the time the first packet date came around
she had already done at least a packet's worth of art and writing by email.
After that I think her intention was still to do packets but by each packet
date she had piled up a packet's worth of email work and art but not done
much of a formal annotation kind. I'm not sure when I first mentioned what
was happening with her to you, but I think there was a phone conversation
somewhere mid-term.
I asked her to compile the emails and artwork for her website partly
so that she would see for herself how extraordinary an accomplishment it
was, but partly also so that there would be formal work of a packet sort
on record.
Study plan. I'm wondering whether you're right that she'd have felt more
secure naming what she was doing earlier on. Could we have done it sooner?
I don't know. Anything that made her feel more secure would have been good,
surely. But I think in all of this we do have to keep remembering that she
went off her meds without telling anyone. Toward the end of the semester
she started to get paranoid. And then she wasn't just paranoid about me,
she was paranoid about everybody.
This is important, I think. I don't mean I wasn't at fault for not foreseeing
that she could fall back into psychosis, but I do mean that given the evidence
both you and I had during the semester we weren't wrong to think she was
doing well.
About the relation of embodiment studies and somatic processing: in my
understanding one of the implications of embodiment studies is that people
need to understand somatic processing/reintegration work, and they need
to do it somewhere, but they don't need to do it at [the college]. When
students are interested I am now outlining what I know about how it works
and sending them to books and saying they can do it on their own or with
a helper of some kind, not necessarily a therapist.
a. For better and worse there will never be another MB. I mean none of
that will happen again.
MB was so volatile and dependent. When she emailed freaking out it didn't
occur to me to say, I'm legally barred from talking to you about this. But
it would certainly occur to me now.
That's kind of horrible isn't it. When she got paranoid we all did.
I had a psychotic student this term and I handled her with tongs: I did
not engage.
b. I have not thought of the more personal transactions I've had with
students as therapy because I've thought of them as fellow-feeling. When
I have seen them in distress and confusion that I know something about I've
said, In my experience this is what it's about, this is what works. I've
told on myself. A therapist does not do that.
The alternative seems to be to see them in distress and confusion and
know what would help and refuse to say it because one is covering one's
ass.
Committing myself to ass-covering feels shameful. Committing myself to
being supervised into ass-covering feels worse than shameful, it's a tightness
at the heart, my blood pressure shoots up, I start to feel accident-prone.
If you want me to check with you about everything I do, are you also
going to check with everybody else? Lise is personal with students too -
it's a feminist thing. And are you ever going to say to people, This is
too timid, indirect, impersonal, polite? Or are you only going to say to
me, This is too courageous, direct, generous, personal? Is it now
going to be nothing but regression toward suppression and safety?
During my first four years at [the college], I felt winged, and you were
the miracle supporting wings. You saw all my letters for a semester, and
after that you saw all the bold ones, because I was proud of them and trusted
you with them. And you liked them! I was overjoyed to have found a boss
who didn't want me to be small.
This crisis is like what happens to everyone in early love, I think,
and then again and again. There's open-hearted trust, and then there's a
disaster, and then there's a choice whether to withdraw from trust into
cynicism and concealment, or to find a way, with more complexity, to save
open-heartedness so there can be real strength rather than bluff. I know
you want the latter, because that's your way. So let's get this to feel
right.
c. I would like to do anything possible to get you off any hot seat with
admin, and if enunciating a policy does that I will certainly help, but
we have already put a lot of time into it and it's all been superficial
because people are personally so scared of it, and professionally feel so
amorphous a threat.
- - -
- June 6, 2007
-
- Dear Ellie,
-
- I can't believe I did this, and am not quite
certain why I did it, but I reread all the material around MB. I don't
believe I know a whole lot more now than I did when we talked about all
this long ago but I want, in this private note to you, to reiterate what
I think the outstanding points are even though I know that you are so done
with thinking about this - or certain aspects of it. I find that I am not
through, have not come to rest. I know that as a program and as a college
we will be dealing with aspects of the situation in the coming years -
just in terms of coming to a more articulated sense of what we all mean
by a truly holistic education that both asks for and honors "personal
development." As well as appropriate parameters around advising and
"therapy." Perhaps it is this aspect that drives me to keep trying
to understand the essence, distill the lessons, find insight into the nature
of our educational approach - how it is, how it could be. And I realize
as I spend a ridiculous amount of time on this (again) that I have been
reluctant to address some aspects of the situation-including my own responsibilities.
Below are some of my thoughts:
-
- 1. In rereading the material I was literally
stunned by the gift you gave her. Whatever else is true, you gave her the
kind of attention, love, considered response, totally unswerving positive
regard that I am pretty sure does not exist outside of certain highly unusual
relationships. I was about to say outside high paid therapists but even
they would not have been able to give the sort of full time consistent
attention that you gave to MB.
-
- The biggest sadness I feel about everything that
happened subsequently is that, at least for now, she has undermined not
just the relationship with you and with the many people at [the college]
who care deeply for her (including me) who also gave her time and attention,
but that she has undermined herself and her work. With the level of support
you gave, and the courage she showed in her work, she moved through a great
deal and showed signs of becoming the kind of healthy (or to use your word,
sane) person she has the inherent capacity to be.
-
- I hope and believe that she will come back to
the work she did at some point in the future and not just know that it
was exceptional, but to begin to build on it again. For the entire semester
and into the summer, you gave her this Ellie. You made the commitment to
her. You believed in her. You stood by her. You saw her. You kept clear
throughout. I honor you for that. I am not sure anyone else could have
done this without freaking out - thus closing down the whole precious opening.
I know I could not.
-
- 2. You absolutely should have been in close consultation
with me about not having packets. About going forward with the semester
as an email exchange. I am sure I would have said fine and looked at it
as a measured experiment. I hope I would have been wise enough to also
suggest some safeguards, check in points and so on. I might not have been
but then it would have been my fault, not yours if something went awry.
At its best, we might have been savvy enough to forestall some of the more
emotional fall out that happened post semester. I know myself well enough
to know that for there to be an insightful edge this exchange would have
to have been done in conversation rather than email. When in new, unknown
territory of this sort, I work best by mulling things over in good (verbal)
company. But, however we did it, it needed to be done.
-
- 3. I appreciate that the unfolding nature of
the conversation pretty much precluded getting a handle on a new study
plan. Or felt like it did. And I appreciate that you and she did have the
conversation about a new study plan draft later on in the semester. Yet,
somehow, with a change this radical, you should have sought one of those
moments of pause in the flow of angst and revelation (and there were lots
of these pauses - thanks be), to try and nail down the new trajectory and
form. It would have reassured her and inserted a structure into what had
become, by any of our usual parameters, completely unmoored, a virtual
free flow.
-
- 4. The most difficult issue to get a handle on
is the one the IMA is discussing: therapy/personal development/"being"
degree criteria. For me to even articulate my sense of this is taking a
very long time - so long I began to wonder just why. Here is where I have
gotten to - which isn't nearly far enough in terms of where I need to be
or we as a program and a college need to arrive:
-
- a) Given [the college's] existing understandings,
historical practice, and the general state of higher education (NEASC standards,
professionally accepted practice), what you did with MB would be considered
therapy and, as such is not acceptable. This much is clear and has potential
legal ramifications (and already had repercussions in terms of apparent
harm to the student - whatever the long term positive effects may be).
That you in fact celebrated the work you did with MB in very public ways
means that I did not do my job well enough. Had I been clearer with you,
you would have known that you had transgressed a significant boundary (or,
better yet, would have known not to transgress in the first place).
-
- What would it have taken for me to have been
clearer? Well, I should have understood where you were going in your thinking
with embodiment studies as practiced in the advising situation. I should
have foreseen and thus forewarned - more than forewarned - drawn a line.
But I didn't. I am not at all fond of lines but this one is important enough
that I needed to have defined for myself where it lies. And then conveyed
that to you.
-
- Beyond my personal admiration for you and your
work (which is considerable), why didn't I do that? (And this brings us
to the level of our faculty discussions), I believe deeply in challenging
existing assumptions and parameters. I believe the way [the college] practices
our version of progressive education should always be up for challenges,
for experimentation, for addressing increasing levels of integral, holistic
understanding and practice. I know that as a college and a program we encounter
entrenched ways of seeing and challenges to these can be/often are met
with resistance and/or finger pointing. I know that we have not been fully
inclusive of the body and you bring a deeply important, radically interesting
perspective to this conversation. I have been a bit beguiled by the quality
of that conversation, the way you have unfolded it in intellectually challenging
mini courses, on the web worksite, in the semester magazines, with the
active participation of students and faculty, and the promise it has (and
has been fulfilling) to open us up to new ways of understanding that are
mostly expansive.
-
- b) Key questions arise out of this:
-
- How can embodiment studies proceed if you cannot
work directly and deeply with students on an embodied level, through somatic
processing/reintegration, in a holistic educational setting? If emotional
material is banned, or if particular ways of interacting with emotional
material are proscribed, are basic tenants of embodiment studies going
to be unfulfilled?
-
- How can we as a college or a program proceed
holistically if we cannot be inclusive of emotional material (or, for that
matter, deeply spiritual/transpersonal states, unconscious/dream material)
if we are personally uncomfortable with them or even dismissive of them
(either by relegating them to journal entries which we will not comment
upon, or denying their relevance to the work of the semester, or saying
they should be taken away to someone else to deal with - the professional
therapist)? What really do we mean by the "being" criteria if
we are not inclusive of emotional or unconscious or transpersonal states?
-
- c) In challenging our holistic education to become
ever more holistic, the issues you lay out so beautifully in your therapy
and education memo represent a wonderful way into that challenge. I hope
and trust that as a program and as a college we will move forward with
that challenge. It is vitally important to our students (and to our place
in the world of higher education). I will do my part. I really hope that
you will continue to play a lead role as well - you have done a great deal
of ground-breaking thinking and have a coherent paradigm in which these
issues are paramount.
-
- d) In the meantime, we have to work with the
existing guidelines, however fuzzy their edges may be. If you feel like
what you are doing is therapy, then it is and you should not be doing it.
If you find that a significant part of your exchanges with a student are
about emotional processing (even if it is in service of their writing or
their art or even their scholarship) then you have crossed a line that
cannot (yet) be crossed. (In other words, emotional/somatic processing
can be some part of a semester, but it cannot be the ground/foundation/point
of the semester.) Even with those students that you would classify as meeting
basic "sanity" criteria. As we work out the fuzzy areas, staying
in touch is going to be key-with other faculty and with me.
-
- How much is too much? This is almost impossible
to say but in discussing the concrete examples you lay out in your therapy
and education memo, we will, I trust, come to some common sense of the
basic parameters. There will be room for different advisors to advise differently
(because yes, different advisors have different comfort zones with emotional
material and students get to know how different advisors work). We may
end up revising our "personal development" criteria.
-
- It will be my responsibility to facilitate the
discussion and to convey the operational guidelines to all.
-
- e) At an even broader level, we will, I trust,
become clearer about what safeguards best serve the students, faculty,
the program, and the college. I hope we arrive at these understandings
by way of opening up rather than closing down or just remaining with the
status quo. In the meantime, we have to inch forward cautiously, respectful
of the parameters that exist.
- I am committed to doing whatever I can to move
us forward with this challenging exploration.
-
- 5. So, at the end of this day, what am I asking
of you? Three things, I think:
-
- a. Let me know where you are around not having
a semester with any student that could be defined as primarily therapy
based, or puts you in the role of therapist. Even though these boundaries
are likely to remain fuzzy, it is essential that you and I come to the
point where we know and agree upon definitions and how much is too much.
-
- b. During the coming year, talk with me about
how you are working with particular students around this personal edge.
Talking about particulars will help me (and you and all of us) define better
parameters and safeguards, and open ways forward. I know you would rather
email than talk, but I will need both. (Some of your service time can be
officially allocated for this, as well as for the following.)
-
- c. Continue to play a substantive role in our
collective conversation about personal development/"being"/therapy-education.
I need your deep collaboration on this if we are going to move beyond "I
do it this way," and "I do it that way."
-
- I am grateful to you for your patience and understanding
as I work these matters out in my own mind. And very grateful to you for
continuing to work with me and with all of us as we move forward.
-
- Margo
-
- Apologies if too much of this reflects matters
we have already gone over (and over). For our collective well being, I
need to put it all back in the forefront of my brain.]
part 2
- in america volume 13: 2007 may-september
- work & days: a lifetime journal project
|