in america 13 part 1 - 2007 may-june  work & days: a lifetime journal project

25 May 2007

Coming to the end of 6 years at [the college], 5 years in SD.

What have I done since the doc
mbo and the website
a few students
the Alberta trip
camping with Luke
recovered physically I think
Work & days: GW, AG, SH, Frank after
kept faith with T
transient garden beauty

Lived shut away mostly

Do you want to add anything   creation, Ellie, subtle, honesty
Is that what you mean  
For instance the dullness of the journal   no
Will you say more   undefeated, processing, courageous, fight
I did that?   yes
Will you say in relation to what   not withdrawing
I mostly didn't deke out   YES
In my old ways   YES

-

'ocean as sacred wilderness' (surfing doc)

26

There was a hit in w&d this morning - Singapore - someone who searched 'Babby Tiong' and checked through to the index page of AG16. So I read that page, which was the Christmas I was writing analog/digital. I loved the writing. I was feeling how, since what I'm transcribing in DR, I'd gotten to writing exactly what I'll later want to read.

Am transcribing the weeks moving around as a camp attendant. I remember around what I wrote, but what I remember isn't written.

What I got to toward the end of AG and in through GW to the first vol of [this section] was right being and writing, both. [The college] is costing me a lot. Quitting and being an artist on a grant isn't the solution. The deadlines and standards [at SFU] made a difference.

Writing beside - would that work - after this stretch of DR is transcribed, 1975-1980, whenever I went back to Vancouver - the blindsided stretch 1976-1980 - what wd it be about - lesbians - the stoned credulity era - at the same time the experimental film science reading - at the same time high-hormone early 30s erotic heat - at the same time the land-feeling that was unknown to my companions - where did the myth feeling come from, goddess stuff in feminism - struggle to find or make a platform in art, lost because I was refusing a lot -

In that late AG journal there's so much certainty - even in great pain I wasn't unsure. It's a settled self. That self is the accomplishment, it's much more outward. It watches itself, I had learned to do that, but what it notices in that is worth noticing, which in DR often it wasn't.

It's so much a work of time. If I had died too soon there'd have been mostly just a mess.

I'm at Starbucks at an outside table, writing on my knee, right leg up on the chair. I've whipped through the LA Times and the Union. A soy chai latte. There's a breeze. Blooming jacarandas throwing shadow onto the sidewalk - the morning grey has burned off. I'm wearing my green cord jeans with the shortsleeved black linen shirt. A black collar always suits me. I'm tanned. Have a pink thriving look these days though I'm thick at the waist. Writing in sunglasses because of the glare. Love the bite of sun on my arm.

A man reading at the next table. He's holding a small hardback almost at arm's length, breathing slowly as if asleep. A large man in his forties, blue jean shorts and pale blue teeshirt. All the men on this sidewalk, as it happens, are wearing pants cut off at the knee. It's Memorial Day weekend. Tom's working though it's Saturday.

I have horrible Darlene's packet to get out of the way, get it over with, to have time next week to start at Dawne. Nora's selling it. We'd never been there together, went yesterday. Nina and Todd's junk gone. There's the hillside full and tall, ceanothus, the matilijas coming into bloom 6' up. Nor stood at the kitchen window looking out at the view, feeling her years in that house, the man, his wrecked death, how far she has taken her rescue, the moment of giving it up after perfecting it first.

27

Jam's copy of Selected Cantos that I somehow still have and didn't get rid of when I dumped Rilke and Roethke - her notes in pencil, a few, written very small - when I see her handwriting I remember, slightly remember, loving her. I like it - tiny tight roundness. It's confident and incisive, has scholarly precision. In what way is it more elegant than mine - it has more dash but that's not all of it. There's conscious style in the way she'll sometimes use * for e. Wife, eyes. She has two kinds of s and two kinds of e. I'm more a plodder. In Dames rocket the two kinds of teacher, no, more than two: Kiyooka's girls for dope mind, Jam for focus, Nellie for swash, Daphne for writing close to the instant, did I learn from Josie? I loved Josie.

The way Jam's handwriting says her nervous system is better than mine - and yet she was crazier and meaner, crankier. Alright, yes, I'll let myself recover the way I loved in that time - can I? - abjectly.

1975-1985 Vancouver, Alberta, Saturna. 820 A E Pender
Paul, Maggie, Nellie, T and C, Jam, Robert MacLean
Le Guin,
film, writing, photographs, tapes
science reading, science fiction
began Joyce, tarot

It begins with arriving in Vancouver, ends with Michael and the downtown East End. Want to say ends with what will we know but it went on for a while after that. No, ends pregnant and trapped with Jam who is crazier and crankier than she was. But still we see light together sublimely. But she hates me, she despises me for catching her in her weakness.

Jam is the one to write - could I? Light metaphysics. I chose well though hard. I picked a phenomenon. The work was done when I'd spent that month with her box of books. And then misery dragged on for another five years.

Leaving the lake house in the fall of 1980.
That's a marker.
Reading wwwk in Trudy's place is another.
An apron, an inkwell in the foundered house.

29

Saturday and Sunday night at Tom's. Packet 5s this morning, Dawne this aft, coming home in the Acura with Aretha cranked, happy. Can't write it tonight.

30

I had stuck the datura under the honeysuckle because it was yellowy, and didn't notice it was going to bloom. Saturday I was watering the pots and there it was with a pink flower and three more in large bud. Took it inside and Sunday evening - only in the evening - it diffused an exquisite scent from the mantle. I was standing under it with my nose up the trumpet and Tom was laughing from his corner.

We drove to La Jolla with beautiful Nora who took the long route to entertain us, 52 that treed valley, and then up over Mt Soledad to see Pacific Beach far below, further than seems possible given that Mt Soledad isn't very high.

Beautiful Nora in baseball cap, big eyes and redhead's flush and pretty roundnesses below. It's always an occasion when I'm with her.

We loaded two shovels and a pick and a rake and then Tom and I went for steaks to Denny's in PB. Memorial Day weekend at the beach. Three drunken louts in muscle shirts, burned red, white skin under the arms, calling to girls walking past to the washroom.

Home in the green executive car. Tom was conscious of being seen in it.

We stopped at Blockbusters and picked two each. School of rock and what was the other one of Tom's, Babel, that night.

We are so comfortable together these days. I'm saying that knowing it won't always be so, although it now feels as if it will. There's Tom not eating fat and losing his pooch, handsome-headed with a good haircut. Saturday night he was going on about writing a Vanishing San Diego piece with me, it was two in the morning.

Sunday I went home to deal with my mail and came back with supper. Greek salad and hamburgers, raspberry sherbet. Then my two movies, a doc about New York fifth graders in a ballroom dance competition, Mad hot ballroom, and then Dune, which was over-the-top bad.

We are watching movies together very companionably, cuddling and commenting.

The best of the weekend was Sunday morning when we got in the car, Tom driving, and cruised slowly up El Cajon and back on University. The ethnic neighborhoods, storefront churches and chiropractors, a warm quiet morning with a cool breeze, streets empty. We got into the gazing trance I like, silent together just looking. Gardens, houses, early summer, jacarandas and palms. Dire straits, Knofler's sharp fine precise soulful touch spinning out his perfect line.

Yesterday Statcounter showed someone in New York getting into Work & days through the In America 4 index page. Checked through to that page and read it. It was ravishing. I'm not writing like that now but there it is, I did accomplish it. It's relaxed and intent. In any circumstance it's very readable.

Yesterday midafternoon after I'd been reading packets that had come in I drove to Dawne and was in the quiet garden shaping the olive trees, thinning them and pruning up to show their white legs, clearing the steps down, ripping out grass at the bottom of the hill. Loved being there, loved having the garden back, with the junky renters gone. Doves on the wire. The bird that sounds like a gurgle of water.

-

My bp felt high after I was writing to Darlene this morning and I checked it. 190/105, highest I've seen it. Scared me. It's felt low, silky relaxed, so what is it today. Darlene and then being scared of it. No wonder I hate her. But what is it about her, just her disorderedness? Exercise yesterday?

Am I going to die of a stroke   no
Seriously be injured by  no
Will I have to take 3 drugs and a statin   no
Can I do it w/o meds  
Hard exercise every day   no
Every other day  
Treadmill 15 min  
Lose 15 pounds  

-

At four o'clock after finishing two letters, drove to Tom's to get him. Went to the beach at South Mission. It was quiet after the holiday, ocean green and silver, rolling choppy silver, pelicans turning suddenly straight down, folding at the last moment, a thrilling collapse.

'In India people believe that beauty is humans' relation to the divine.' Mira Nakasima on PBS craft show.

The motion of the water was unseeable, unstoppable, but two kinds of glitter though fast can be held somewhat. The moment when the near edge of the wave is rapidly pulling back and the last slick of water on sand glitters between the grains. It's very fleet, a field of minute flashes, the whole field running away leaving smoothness behind. The other is the whole surface to the horizon on the line directly to the sun. I can't remember it to describe it, except to say it's shattered silver in commotion, constant and jittery. Look better next time.

In the car Tom said "Hold out your hand. Turn it. Now the other one, closer so I can see it. You're shaky today." "Yes I'm quivery, how did you know." "I felt it." I was scared when he was driving.

31

Used the car to go to Amvets, bought swim trunks for Tom that I left on his bed with summer pj pants and a moss green waffle t. Phoned him when I got home. He loves the shorts. Gurkha-surfer he said. I'm chuffed.

Is it driving that is making me happy these days. Fleet sleek pretty car. Dark green. Best shape for a car.

Moss green linen short-sleeved shirt for me. Socks, drinking glasses.

1st June

The period we now live in, the twenty-first century, is perhaps the only time in human history when common people have held so little knowledge of the sky. 32
 
Craig Childs 2006 House of rain: tracking a vanished civilization across the American southwest Little, Brown and Co
 
- A minicourse called The sky
 
cycles - sun rise and set
moon rise and set
zenith and nadir
sky words from Persian
optics
transparency currents marking the invisible
straight lines in nature
 
Tenuous body: the sky
 
a particular place
an interdisciplinary
visualizing
the frame of the sky
spatial mapping
environmental studies, consciousness studies, TLA - embodiment studies as ground of all
the language of
psychology of sky
guided reverie
Bachelard, Minnaert, cloud book, vis tapes
 
What does it feel like
 
What color is the sky?
 
Yeats on moon cycle
'blueskying'
openness
imagining blue
gravity and the lines out
invisible communication
wind
daily sky photo
daily sky writing
is there sky literature
sound
water, earth, rock
sky as matter - tenuous to dense
Buddhists
the motion of the Milky Way
 
The people had tied themselves to points on the horizon and points in the sky 35
 
confirming the peerless order of the world 40
 
turquoise, bear paws, mountain lion claws
 
supernova in AD 1054 as bright as the full moon for almost a month, visible in the middle of the day. At night it bathed the earth in a ghostly ruby-colored light. It was positioned off Orion's shoulder Over the next six years this light slowly faded
 
the Neolithic: China 12,000 BC, Greece 6500 BC, Mississippi 2500 BC, Chaco 11,000 AD
 
a formative stage nearly every civilization has gone through, a tipping point where wild plant gathering mixed with domestic agriculture and domestic animals
 
Early metallurgy usually started with copper networks of farming villages As part of Neolithic development, enormous stone and wood architecture often showed up, as if people were experimenting with their new-found ability to pool labor 44
 
Polaris 'dependable and due north'
the great North Road
 
architecture professor who had studied how various cultures align themselves on the land
 
had intentionally nested themselves into a landscape
 
digging into one of these humps discovered a bowl delicately carved ... out of its lip inset, where a lid was seated ... a handful of turquoise inside
 
deepest rooms storing ceramic ollas filled with water
 
18.6 year lunar standstill cycle - at the full of winter solstice, where the moon rises at sunset the waxing half will rise at the following spring equinox and the new at sunrise at summer solstice, the waning half at noon at autumn equinox. 2004
 
sipapu - hole in the floor of a kiva said to be entrance to another world
sitalpu - Hopi flower world - luminously colored spirit realm existing alongside this one - ancestors in clouds, flowers and stars
 
the Hopi are descendents - mesas in northeast Arizona -
 
I have been trying to understand the qualities of distances by actually moving across them
 
Also Zuni etc, NW New Mexico, katsina religion - Taos
Navajo - SW 16th c from SE Alaska and BC
 
Puebloans is the neutral term
 
a form of organization carried across a landscape
 
It tasted like good, earthen water.
 
A chemical signature of local soils passes through nutrients in food and is imprinted into certain molars, forming an indelible birth certificate. 329
 
Less than 5' tall
 
pools from which people are said to have emerged
 
House of rain is where the dead go.
a watery paradise inside a mountain
fabled underground lake
 
spinning fires to life on a fire board
 
Places where water emerges from stone, dark holes into the underworld, are profoundly sacred.
 
northwestern Chihuahua corn 4000 years old
Central America 5000 years ago
corn, beans and squash seeds, AD 400 cotton

2

Kri irritating me today. Her arguments say men aren't inherently violent, boys aren't inherently combative, it's only when they are crowded, it's only when they are abused, neglected, it's only when resources are tight, there COULD be a peaceful world, a safe world.

What do I hate about that.

For instance the three of us at home fighting very naturally, fighting and getting along, and again. The naturalness, though the adults yell. My pleasure in being able to fight with Tom. Irritation with people I have to back off from.

She has a good question: what would have to change to prevent the kind of warring that destroys intelligence and fine life.

Free energy and action.

She's very combative  
Am I right to say men are that  
Am I right to say it costs them  
War on one side and babies on the other  
Does she have any access to the instinctual   no
She's very heady  
Wanting to let loose and protect  
Joy of letting loose  
What was wrong with Mennonite men  
Callous disregard  
Lives that come up against death  
The humans need war  
Should she try speaking for the other side  
There is an other side, value of war  
Value of death  
She leans too much on 'conditioning'  
It's not deus ex machina, it's body too  
Her writing is at its best describing aikido  
Complexity  
I am at war  
Subtly all the time  
And so is she  
Anyone who is interesting is  
50% of people have IQs less than 100  
Evolutionary quality from combat  

4

[Ida Rolf notes]

collagen myofascial connective tissue

can be changed by adding energy

fascial connective tissue is the organ of structure

relation of the body to the gravitational field

rolfers are integrating something

Korzybski

structure overstressed and shortened, skewed so the joints can't set up verticality

As soon as you get balance you get strength.

Flow of fluid giving interchange from bloodstream

Anything that contributes to really good physiology is properly part of a moral code. 63

a time in the course of - when you see that your [client] is able to align but doesn't want to

misunderstanding the way we build a body

"top of my head up and back of my waist back" every 15 minutes, just say it

Structure gives you a criterion by which to evaluate people.

Look at the person in terms of his shoulders, the way his neck sits, and the way his cranium sits on his neck. 190

Fascia on the outside will be so tight ... it will tend to protect the area that's in trouble ... If you are doing the right thing and there isn't some deep pathology, the fascia will let go.

A rolfer wants to get it so that individual elements inside that bandage are able to slide and organize and adjust with movement.

-

Chicken for supper last night, tamari and mustard coated, under the grill 6 minutes per side - better chicken than I've made, ever. Another texture, less dead, wet.

Sore muscles these days. I'm feeling a flesh fold at the back of my waist on the right, feels bad.

5

Craig Childs on the Anasazi. It's a book, like his others about walking in the Four Corners lands. He's talking to archeologists learning what they know and learning to see what they see in a landscape, and working to build a sense of the human history of his own childhood place. He's doing it by working on a book. The book lays out what he's learned by telling the physical story of his visits to places - how he held his hands, how he climbed a slope, how he lay with his stepfather in shade at noon. He is sometimes with his baby and wife, and he mentions them or his other companions briefly. Weather, terrain, time of day. The story of traveling. What am I looking to say. Something about what his work is. The secret knowledge of water was about perception - he put himself into extreme need so that he would perceive more and then be able to write about doing so. House of rain is not as solitary, he is meshed into the concerns of archeologists. He is synthesizing archeology, but also integrating it with geography and his own physical experience of terrain.

He is a figure in his book: athletic, heroic, intent. "Naturalist, adventurer, desert ecologist" says the back flap. But carefully modest, conscious. He's another kind of writer who both does and writes, and he's not the locked-into-maleness kind of man who would have written about the southwest a generation ago. He's more intact but not less hardy. The old kind of man would have had to drink to feel. This book is less ecstatic, is what it is. What I'm seeing is small tight handwriting - it's not a whole-body book.

Something forms by means of it - did form, at moments. I'm not remembering it now. It was earlier in the book, when he was standing in ruins imagining them inhabited. Something about archeology, people giving their lifetimes to imagining an anthropology, creating an understory of time, an underworld of time. Anthropology and the sipapu. What had to happen to make this moment what it is.

- There is that, but it's not what I was tracking and what my body said yes to. (Do we have any visualization of that, something like the sipapu?)

- It's imagining destruction, imagining death. It's a true vision of evanescence. We have of the past what it has made of us. And of the future what we are making in it.

Not 'have' but are. But that's not what I meant to say either.

- When I'm camping alone in wild places and see people or a face as I'm falling asleep, what is that? Always only one image a night, always clear and particular.

It's Tuesday morning, grey. It'll be hot by evening, I had the window open last night, but it's cold now. I still have Kri's letter to finish, and then 8 evaluations to hustle through this week. This aft have to speak to a man called Alfred about rototilling at Dawne.

Paul is up north traveling with Dave Leonard.

There were weeks with a lot of hits on all my sites, and this month, so far, almost nothing.

Sunday aft Tom and I watched an early Democratic debate.

Michael Duke yesterday sane and looking well. He comes back from the brink.

6

The geographic difference of the US - that it has vast regions so different from others, and that Americans have felt these regions as legendary. As if the southwest is the legendary core.

-

Margo's eval up to the end of the Emily semester.

Good: maybe: Margo is back.

She was dredging up Emily because she's coming back still clouded administratively and they're watching her - she's in a bind - she believed in what I was doing - she wants souls to win through -

But her perceived duty is to rein me in -

So she has to be seen to rein me in - so she's saying next semester I must consult about how I work with students, which enrages me. I'd rather go flat than do that.

If I'm going to go flat I should find work I can be whole-hearted in   
My relation with Margo is spoiled unfixably  

Question is, how can I work at [the college] without M's confidence in me.

M is harrowed, that's why she's starting there.

She feels she did something wrong. Did she?   no

She's pinning it on packet format and study plan!

Something generous and courageous and true-spirited has gone wrong.
Inspiring work - it is inspiring work.
Stop being generous, courageous and true-hearted?
Crisis.
I'm not willing to be micromanaged and shouldn't be.
I'm willing to promise I won't do any personal work with people - am I? I'll do that for her. But my heart is angry saying so.
No - I won't do that. I looked at my letters for this semester and no they are as they should be.
 
She isn't strong enough to see me through this   
So I have to be stronger than she is  

I did good work with Kri and Polly and Justin, and they were the most personal.

So should I just train to be a therapist?   no
She wants to make rules for everybody but I'm the only one they are aimed at because I'm the only one who can do this stuff  
Kri got how to integrate verbal and nonverbal in the academic  

Justin got through the conference and his love terror, he saw an abandonment kin.

Polly got brave and then backed up and then got work  
These people feel seen in their wholeness  
The segregation of therapy is nonsense  
Jimmy got a look at his voice splits  

Becci got through.

I can see roots and I've done the work.

Do you think I'm too personal   no
Do you have anything you want to say about this   no
I'm being asked to conform to a pathology  

I thought she was supporting me because she was courageous and principled, but it was more that she is overawed.

Is there an implication   coming through early love to responsibility with the uncon
Her uncon  

7

I woke at 4 stressed about Margo.
What to do about the stress. Heart pressure.
There were wonderful years feeling I had her confidence, creative, expansive, learning.
She supported risk, she liked my largeness.
August 2001 - August 2005 four years
2 years since then have been less
I flunked a test with Mil and Susan
 
Should I quit   no
 
I was out of my depth with Mil because I didn't understand paranoia, I didn't know she would turn.
Loss of confidence and candor.
It's what happens to early love - just here - the decision to shut down and withhold.
It's a familiar crisis.
I feel myself going bitter, I say I'll hide my light.
 
Her suggestions are wrong  

Art and art therapy - she was studying that.

What do I want.

To be large-spirited, confident, generous, creative, energized, brilliant, transparent in work.

Is that still possible?  

As opposed to polite, dull, withholding, secretive, mediocre.

It plays out everybody's drama  
Am I still going to be able to love Margo   no
Am I still going to be able to love students  

"Lighter and freer"

Because she has failed with admin  
So I have to show her how to do it  
Fear winning over love  
I won't have that  
An outcome where love is not defeated by fear, that's what I'm about  
It so easily is  
Does Margo exaggerate the fall-out  
Because of her own oedipal drama  
Is that what you mean  

Justin on the phone last night. Polly didn't call when she said she would. He was distraught. I said he's very distressed by suspense and he can work on that insecure attachment, and this one is very insecure. He said he's not feeling anything. I said doesn't he feel something in his chest. All the time, he says. I say that's feeling. He says he means crying, sobbing. I say there's a lot of energy in the stage he's at, and he can choose to use it on working with himself, so that if he loses Polly he will still have the work he's done, which will help him for next time. I hear him catch that. In the middle of the conversation he says he wants to ask something and I needn't answer: are the person I did the work with and I still together. I say yes, twelve years.

He's so courtly and honorable. He was in the state where it's hard to speak. Word by word. "Thank you for being with me in this - I wanted to say, in this with me." When he wanted to go he said "I feel a lot of affection for you at this moment."

What I have been saying to Margo, thinking to say to Margo, is that I don't think of what I do with students as therapy, I think of it as fellow-feeling. I see them in distress and say to them, In my experience this is how it works. A therapist doesn't tell on herself, I always do.

Should I write out another document giving examples of withholding what I know.

I can think of this as educating Margo.

The point is that I know what's up. She often doesn't. My situation is different because I do know.

I feel my heart going tight thinking of the question of her supervising me.

I need her to tell me what part of this is her initiative and what, if anything, is required of her.

She wants to insist on the phone - because there's no record - and because she can hear honesty and put me on the spot? If so she's not candid, because she says she needs to talk things out. She could talk them out with someone else.

I need to keep this going until I get other money.

Would I make a project of it - write something.
The personal in education.
What the pressures are.
What the customary blankness is for.
What M's fear is

9

Statcounter is run by an Irishman called Aodhán, I mean run from Ireland, as I found out this morning when I got a note asking me to vote for him as European Entrepreneur under 25.

Working with Al Davalos at Dawne yesterday, two hours with dirt and hillside, the lower rectangle clean for the first time, smooth and bare, framed with a good green, looking up at the finished hillside, a landing.

There was a wet spot at the base of the hill, very wet. I wondered whether he'd rototilled into a pipe and so put the spade down into a spot that I thought might be the origin. There was water rushing into the hole through what looked like a round pipe on its side. No pipe though, just a firm hole. I excavated back. It took a turn. It was a gopher hole. I had my arm up it feeling its firm round sides out into solid earth. It was draining the hillside from someplace higher up, a riser now swamped by brush.

My jeep guy, Bob, at Robert's Automotive yesterday. I was talking to him about buying a Cherokee, marveling the way I always do, at how wonderful a man he is. I go away in a little dazzle of liking. He's good looking, he's a jeep specialist, he's relaxed, he's generous with his time, I never feel he's hurrying away. He has a porous, kind, taking-in quality like the best doctors. It's intelligence. He's settled into life. He's pleased with it. When he was leaving he said "I'm sorry about your jeep" and I felt he had put a gentle finger on my chest; that was what I needed from him and he'd given it.

11

Jia Zhang-ke 2000 Platform, Fenyang Shanxi.

Patient long takes.

This weekend with Tom.

I woke during the night and found my hand above me had curled around his forearm. Later I woke again and found his hand under my pillow.

We watched Platform Saturday night and again yesterday. We hadn't figured out that we could turn on the subtitles. Long takes of a sand-colored town among stony mountains the same color, or people in bare rooms seeming to be camping in ruins. Every frame beautiful - my kind of framing. A specific palette, blue and sand often with a speck of red. Inside, the off-green I know from Chinatown rooms. Framing quite formal, not afraid to be gorgeous. Few very intentional camera movements. The actors very natural in their postures. Fiddling with their hair, slouching.

Afterward we discovered the subtitle button and watched an interview with the director. Luke's age, a nice face. Someone from deep country showing what he saw when he was a child, showing it to understand it.

The other thing that happened was that I downloaded my letter to Margo, that had her letter appended, and Tom sat intent on both with his glasses on for twenty minutes, and then gave his considered summation, compact and lucid of his best.

All weekend I was listening to myself laugh, I imagined someone upstairs hearing us laughing together again and again.

[M,

Your letter is exquisitely careful to be just and generous and hopeful. Nonetheless it was distressing, stressing. More about that below.

This is a beautiful statement of dilemma:

How can we as a college or a program proceed holistically if we cannot be inclusive of emotional material (or, for that matter, deeply spiritual/transpersonal states, unconscious/dream material) if we are personally uncomfortable with them or even dismissive of them (either by relegating them to journal entries which we will not comment upon, or denying their relevance to the work of the semester, or saying they should be taken away to someone else to deal with-the professional therapist)? What really do we mean by the "being" criteria if we are not inclusive of emotional or unconscious or transpersonal states?

But the reality is that both you and I are now being scrutinized and we are having to bend over backwards to avoid an appearance of overstepping or sanctioning overstepping. It's no longer about my best judgment or yours, or about best definitions we can come up with, it is about the amorphous judgments of others.

What has happened is a large loss and I'm sad about it, as I'm sure you are.

I certainly don't want to get you into any more trouble, and I certainly will do what I can not to.

- I wrote those last three paragraphs and then I thought for a couple of days and realized that I need to know whether you are feeling explicit pressure from admin to closely supervise me, or whether it's your own idea. I know you are coming back feeling somewhat under a cloud, but are you having to give someone assurances that you are adequately curbing me? Is someone going to be asking to see evidence? I need to know this because I need to know for sure whether it now is about my best judgment and yours, or whether it IS about satisfying people who have much less idea of how anything works.

About packets - I don't remember why I didn't formally ask for your okay to do her semester as email rather than packets but I think it was because in the first half of the semester the decision came after the fact. She began her semester with email the moment she got home and then the work was so thick and fast that by the time the first packet date came around she had already done at least a packet's worth of art and writing by email. After that I think her intention was still to do packets but by each packet date she had piled up a packet's worth of email work and art but not done much of a formal annotation kind. I'm not sure when I first mentioned what was happening with her to you, but I think there was a phone conversation somewhere mid-term.

I asked her to compile the emails and artwork for her website partly so that she would see for herself how extraordinary an accomplishment it was, but partly also so that there would be formal work of a packet sort on record.

Study plan. I'm wondering whether you're right that she'd have felt more secure naming what she was doing earlier on. Could we have done it sooner? I don't know. Anything that made her feel more secure would have been good, surely. But I think in all of this we do have to keep remembering that she went off her meds without telling anyone. Toward the end of the semester she started to get paranoid. And then she wasn't just paranoid about me, she was paranoid about everybody.

This is important, I think. I don't mean I wasn't at fault for not foreseeing that she could fall back into psychosis, but I do mean that given the evidence both you and I had during the semester we weren't wrong to think she was doing well.

About the relation of embodiment studies and somatic processing: in my understanding one of the implications of embodiment studies is that people need to understand somatic processing/reintegration work, and they need to do it somewhere, but they don't need to do it at [the college]. When students are interested I am now outlining what I know about how it works and sending them to books and saying they can do it on their own or with a helper of some kind, not necessarily a therapist.

a. For better and worse there will never be another MB. I mean none of that will happen again.

MB was so volatile and dependent. When she emailed freaking out it didn't occur to me to say, I'm legally barred from talking to you about this. But it would certainly occur to me now.

That's kind of horrible isn't it. When she got paranoid we all did.

I had a psychotic student this term and I handled her with tongs: I did not engage.

b. I have not thought of the more personal transactions I've had with students as therapy because I've thought of them as fellow-feeling. When I have seen them in distress and confusion that I know something about I've said, In my experience this is what it's about, this is what works. I've told on myself. A therapist does not do that.

The alternative seems to be to see them in distress and confusion and know what would help and refuse to say it because one is covering one's ass.

Committing myself to ass-covering feels shameful. Committing myself to being supervised into ass-covering feels worse than shameful, it's a tightness at the heart, my blood pressure shoots up, I start to feel accident-prone.

If you want me to check with you about everything I do, are you also going to check with everybody else? Lise is personal with students too - it's a feminist thing. And are you ever going to say to people, This is too timid, indirect, impersonal, polite? Or are you only going to say to me, This is too courageous, direct, generous, personal? Is it now going to be nothing but regression toward suppression and safety?

During my first four years at [the college], I felt winged, and you were the miracle supporting wings. You saw all my letters for a semester, and after that you saw all the bold ones, because I was proud of them and trusted you with them. And you liked them! I was overjoyed to have found a boss who didn't want me to be small.

This crisis is like what happens to everyone in early love, I think, and then again and again. There's open-hearted trust, and then there's a disaster, and then there's a choice whether to withdraw from trust into cynicism and concealment, or to find a way, with more complexity, to save open-heartedness so there can be real strength rather than bluff. I know you want the latter, because that's your way. So let's get this to feel right.

c. I would like to do anything possible to get you off any hot seat with admin, and if enunciating a policy does that I will certainly help, but we have already put a lot of time into it and it's all been superficial because people are personally so scared of it, and professionally feel so amorphous a threat.

- - -

June 6, 2007
 
Dear Ellie,
 
I can't believe I did this, and am not quite certain why I did it, but I reread all the material around MB. I don't believe I know a whole lot more now than I did when we talked about all this long ago but I want, in this private note to you, to reiterate what I think the outstanding points are even though I know that you are so done with thinking about this - or certain aspects of it. I find that I am not through, have not come to rest. I know that as a program and as a college we will be dealing with aspects of the situation in the coming years - just in terms of coming to a more articulated sense of what we all mean by a truly holistic education that both asks for and honors "personal development." As well as appropriate parameters around advising and "therapy." Perhaps it is this aspect that drives me to keep trying to understand the essence, distill the lessons, find insight into the nature of our educational approach - how it is, how it could be. And I realize as I spend a ridiculous amount of time on this (again) that I have been reluctant to address some aspects of the situation-including my own responsibilities. Below are some of my thoughts:
 
1. In rereading the material I was literally stunned by the gift you gave her. Whatever else is true, you gave her the kind of attention, love, considered response, totally unswerving positive regard that I am pretty sure does not exist outside of certain highly unusual relationships. I was about to say outside high paid therapists but even they would not have been able to give the sort of full time consistent attention that you gave to MB.
 
The biggest sadness I feel about everything that happened subsequently is that, at least for now, she has undermined not just the relationship with you and with the many people at [the college] who care deeply for her (including me) who also gave her time and attention, but that she has undermined herself and her work. With the level of support you gave, and the courage she showed in her work, she moved through a great deal and showed signs of becoming the kind of healthy (or to use your word, sane) person she has the inherent capacity to be.
 
I hope and believe that she will come back to the work she did at some point in the future and not just know that it was exceptional, but to begin to build on it again. For the entire semester and into the summer, you gave her this Ellie. You made the commitment to her. You believed in her. You stood by her. You saw her. You kept clear throughout. I honor you for that. I am not sure anyone else could have done this without freaking out - thus closing down the whole precious opening. I know I could not.
 
2. You absolutely should have been in close consultation with me about not having packets. About going forward with the semester as an email exchange. I am sure I would have said fine and looked at it as a measured experiment. I hope I would have been wise enough to also suggest some safeguards, check in points and so on. I might not have been but then it would have been my fault, not yours if something went awry. At its best, we might have been savvy enough to forestall some of the more emotional fall out that happened post semester. I know myself well enough to know that for there to be an insightful edge this exchange would have to have been done in conversation rather than email. When in new, unknown territory of this sort, I work best by mulling things over in good (verbal) company. But, however we did it, it needed to be done.
 
3. I appreciate that the unfolding nature of the conversation pretty much precluded getting a handle on a new study plan. Or felt like it did. And I appreciate that you and she did have the conversation about a new study plan draft later on in the semester. Yet, somehow, with a change this radical, you should have sought one of those moments of pause in the flow of angst and revelation (and there were lots of these pauses - thanks be), to try and nail down the new trajectory and form. It would have reassured her and inserted a structure into what had become, by any of our usual parameters, completely unmoored, a virtual free flow.
 
4. The most difficult issue to get a handle on is the one the IMA is discussing: therapy/personal development/"being" degree criteria. For me to even articulate my sense of this is taking a very long time - so long I began to wonder just why. Here is where I have gotten to - which isn't nearly far enough in terms of where I need to be or we as a program and a college need to arrive:
 
a) Given [the college's] existing understandings, historical practice, and the general state of higher education (NEASC standards, professionally accepted practice), what you did with MB would be considered therapy and, as such is not acceptable. This much is clear and has potential legal ramifications (and already had repercussions in terms of apparent harm to the student - whatever the long term positive effects may be). That you in fact celebrated the work you did with MB in very public ways means that I did not do my job well enough. Had I been clearer with you, you would have known that you had transgressed a significant boundary (or, better yet, would have known not to transgress in the first place).
 
What would it have taken for me to have been clearer? Well, I should have understood where you were going in your thinking with embodiment studies as practiced in the advising situation. I should have foreseen and thus forewarned - more than forewarned - drawn a line. But I didn't. I am not at all fond of lines but this one is important enough that I needed to have defined for myself where it lies. And then conveyed that to you.
 
Beyond my personal admiration for you and your work (which is considerable), why didn't I do that? (And this brings us to the level of our faculty discussions), I believe deeply in challenging existing assumptions and parameters. I believe the way [the college] practices our version of progressive education should always be up for challenges, for experimentation, for addressing increasing levels of integral, holistic understanding and practice. I know that as a college and a program we encounter entrenched ways of seeing and challenges to these can be/often are met with resistance and/or finger pointing. I know that we have not been fully inclusive of the body and you bring a deeply important, radically interesting perspective to this conversation. I have been a bit beguiled by the quality of that conversation, the way you have unfolded it in intellectually challenging mini courses, on the web worksite, in the semester magazines, with the active participation of students and faculty, and the promise it has (and has been fulfilling) to open us up to new ways of understanding that are mostly expansive.
 
b) Key questions arise out of this:
 
How can embodiment studies proceed if you cannot work directly and deeply with students on an embodied level, through somatic processing/reintegration, in a holistic educational setting? If emotional material is banned, or if particular ways of interacting with emotional material are proscribed, are basic tenants of embodiment studies going to be unfulfilled?
 
How can we as a college or a program proceed holistically if we cannot be inclusive of emotional material (or, for that matter, deeply spiritual/transpersonal states, unconscious/dream material) if we are personally uncomfortable with them or even dismissive of them (either by relegating them to journal entries which we will not comment upon, or denying their relevance to the work of the semester, or saying they should be taken away to someone else to deal with - the professional therapist)? What really do we mean by the "being" criteria if we are not inclusive of emotional or unconscious or transpersonal states?
 
c) In challenging our holistic education to become ever more holistic, the issues you lay out so beautifully in your therapy and education memo represent a wonderful way into that challenge. I hope and trust that as a program and as a college we will move forward with that challenge. It is vitally important to our students (and to our place in the world of higher education). I will do my part. I really hope that you will continue to play a lead role as well - you have done a great deal of ground-breaking thinking and have a coherent paradigm in which these issues are paramount.
 
d) In the meantime, we have to work with the existing guidelines, however fuzzy their edges may be. If you feel like what you are doing is therapy, then it is and you should not be doing it. If you find that a significant part of your exchanges with a student are about emotional processing (even if it is in service of their writing or their art or even their scholarship) then you have crossed a line that cannot (yet) be crossed. (In other words, emotional/somatic processing can be some part of a semester, but it cannot be the ground/foundation/point of the semester.) Even with those students that you would classify as meeting basic "sanity" criteria. As we work out the fuzzy areas, staying in touch is going to be key-with other faculty and with me.
 
How much is too much? This is almost impossible to say but in discussing the concrete examples you lay out in your therapy and education memo, we will, I trust, come to some common sense of the basic parameters. There will be room for different advisors to advise differently (because yes, different advisors have different comfort zones with emotional material and students get to know how different advisors work). We may end up revising our "personal development" criteria.
 
It will be my responsibility to facilitate the discussion and to convey the operational guidelines to all.
 
e) At an even broader level, we will, I trust, become clearer about what safeguards best serve the students, faculty, the program, and the college. I hope we arrive at these understandings by way of opening up rather than closing down or just remaining with the status quo. In the meantime, we have to inch forward cautiously, respectful of the parameters that exist.
I am committed to doing whatever I can to move us forward with this challenging exploration.
 
5. So, at the end of this day, what am I asking of you? Three things, I think:
 
a. Let me know where you are around not having a semester with any student that could be defined as primarily therapy based, or puts you in the role of therapist. Even though these boundaries are likely to remain fuzzy, it is essential that you and I come to the point where we know and agree upon definitions and how much is too much.
 
b. During the coming year, talk with me about how you are working with particular students around this personal edge. Talking about particulars will help me (and you and all of us) define better parameters and safeguards, and open ways forward. I know you would rather email than talk, but I will need both. (Some of your service time can be officially allocated for this, as well as for the following.)
 
c. Continue to play a substantive role in our collective conversation about personal development/"being"/therapy-education. I need your deep collaboration on this if we are going to move beyond "I do it this way," and "I do it that way."
 
I am grateful to you for your patience and understanding as I work these matters out in my own mind. And very grateful to you for continuing to work with me and with all of us as we move forward.
 
Margo
 
Apologies if too much of this reflects matters we have already gone over (and over). For our collective well being, I need to put it all back in the forefront of my brain.]

 

part 2


in america volume 13: 2007 may-september
work & days: a lifetime journal project